tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post6797515233878689959..comments2024-03-20T13:54:02.574+08:00Comments on जिन्दगी की पाठशाला: Delusion pertaining to marriage and age of Lord Rama and Maa SitaBhavesh (भावेश )http://www.blogger.com/profile/14963074448634873997noreply@blogger.comBlogger53125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-49117321270217543932023-12-17T15:55:29.601+08:002023-12-17T15:55:29.601+08:00What was the age of Rama and Sita when they got ma...What was the age of Rama and Sita when they got married?<br />User-11609892196445430427 behena had asked me to write an answer to this long time back. There is a lot of inconsistency regarding the age of Bhagwan Sri Ram and Mata Sita when they got married in Valmiki Ramayana.<br /><br />I had a long talk with Bhanu Kiran bhaiya regarding this and we did’nt reach any good conclusion.<br /><br />I will be using online Valmiki Ramayana and Ramayana CE to answer this. At last I will be tagging some people who I think may give a better insight to this issue.<br /><br />Mata Sita’s statements to that rapist Ravana in Online Valmiki Ramayana<br />On residing in the residence of Ikshvaku-s in Ayodhya for twelve years, I was in sumptuosity of all cherishes while relishing all humanly prosperities.<br /><br />In the thirteenth year the lordly king Dasharatha deliberated together with his imperial ministers to anoint Rama as Crown Prince of Ayodhya.<br /><br />My great-resplendent husband was of twenty-five years of age at that time, and to me eighteen years are reckoned up from my birth<br /><br />Source : Valmiki Ramayana Aranya Kanda<br /><br />So if we go by this we get :<br /><br />Mata Sita’s age as 18–12= 6 years<br /><br />Bhagwan Sri Ram’s age as 25–12= 13 years<br /><br />This seems bogus. CE has changed this to 1 year.<br /><br />This is what Mata Sita told Ravana according to CE :<br /><br />I am the daughter of the great-souled Janaka of Mithila. O fortunate one! O supreme among brahmanas! My name is Sita and I am Rama’s wife.<br /><br />I spent one year in Raghava’s residence.I enjoyed all the desired objects of prosperity and everything that humans crave after.<br /><br />After one year was over, the king consulted an assembly of his ministers and honoured my husband, Rama, by deciding to instate him as the heir apparent. Arrangements were being made for Raghava’s consecration.<br /><br />My immensely energetic husband was twenty-five years old<br />then. Rama is famous in the worlds.<br /><br />Source : Baroda CE Valmiki Ramayana Aranya Kanda translated by Bibek Debroy.<br /><br />If we go by this, then Bhagwan Sri Ram was 24 years old, but CE has removed the verse which says Mata Sita was 18 at the time of the exile. If CE had included that, she would have been 17. This is the reason CE gives for removing :<br /><br />Across different versions of the Ramayana and even across different versions of the Valmiki Ramayana, this inconsistency in Rama’s age is<br />impossible to reconcile. The Critical Edition excises a shloka where Sita<br />says she was eighteen at the time.<br /><br />Source : Baroda CE Valmiki Ramayana Aranya Kanda translated by Bibek Debroy.<br /><br />So according to CE, age of Bhagwan Sri Ram was 24 at the time of their marriage, while CE does’nt say anything about Mata Sita’s age.<br /><br />But again even this looks incorrect to me because of this statement of King Dasaratha :<br /><br />""Less than sixteen years of age is my lotus-eyed Rama, and I see no warring aptitude to him with the demons<br /><br />Source : Valmiki Ramayana Bala Kanda<br /><br />Same thing from CE :<br /><br />Having regained his senses, he said, ‘My lotus-eyed Rama is still less than sixteen years of age.<br /><br />Source : Baroda CE Vakmiki Ramayana translated by Bibek Debroy.<br /><br />So if we go by this , then Bhagwan Sri Ram and Lakshman ji were away from Ayodhya for at least 9 years. Which means killing Tataka, protection of Maharishi Vishwamitra’s rituals, journey to Mithila , breaking of Shiv Dhanush , marriage and then journey back to Ayodhya took 9 years.<br /><br />It is difficult to believe that King Dasaratha managed to stay away from Bhagwan Sri Ram for 9 long years because as he could’nt bear the sorrow when he had to exile Bhagwan Sri Ram for 14 years and even gave up his life in sorrow. So its impossible to think that he had managed to stay away from him for 9 years.<br /><br />So I did’nt find any solid evidences about their age. If we go by CE Bhagwan Sri Ram was 24 years old and we don’t find any mention of Mata Sita’s age.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-78208363943626596092023-11-24T05:08:22.806+08:002023-11-24T05:08:22.806+08:00How she was sixed tell me heein in valmiki ramyan ...How she was sixed tell me heein in valmiki ramyan she herself said that she stayed in ayodhya for 2 yrs <br /><br />Bro are you mad aur what shri ram left ayodha when he was 16 with laxman and vishwamitra then how he married at age of 13 and sita was well educated women so she goes to gurukul and she goes gurukul at 11 and did her upnayan sanskaar and for source her teacher name was gargi she stayed in gurukul ashram for 4-5 years and after that she married ram and it is mention in valmiki ramayan the real ramyan that sita stayed 2 yr in ayodhya after marriage then she leaved with ram okay and u forgot about diwvja which means after upanayan sankar the student get new age start from 1 so whe she said that my husband was 25 means 25 years after upanayan sankar and she was 18 means after upanayan sankar and they did upanyaskaar at age of 11 so add 25+11=36 , 18+11=29 and the age difference between rama and sita is correct 6 years ok bro go and read ramayan first and this child marriage thing is only existed in Arbhamic religion okay so don't spread false news Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-2409968335658598622023-11-24T05:05:51.593+08:002023-11-24T05:05:51.593+08:00Then proof it butch that your paigambar mohammad w...Then proof it butch that your paigambar mohammad wass Incconet he never rapes ayesha but u can't proof it cuz there no where written that he was good and Incconet actually he rapes ayesha, fatima and many girls and he married poor ayesha whem she was 6 and fucked her when she was 9 is you bastard prophet was even Human he also fucked his mother and sisters 💀Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-1005618826147526072023-11-24T05:01:27.206+08:002023-11-24T05:01:27.206+08:00Yah yah and ayesha was illegal daughter of mohamma...Yah yah and ayesha was illegal daughter of mohammad which later he married and u are illegal son ok halala process cuz your mother was fucked by 10000000 muslim then u born from ur mother big hole created ny halal right this was also written by your illegitimate dad walt mickey and for your kind information walt mickey is not writer of ramayan valmiki is real writtor of ramayan where he mention that sita herself said that she was 17 years old and rama was 24-25 years old at time of marriage understood son of bastard bitchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-69359660010711373812023-11-24T04:49:02.072+08:002023-11-24T04:49:02.072+08:00Bro are you mad aur what shri ram left ayodha when...Bro are you mad aur what shri ram left ayodha when he was 16 with laxman and vishwamitra then how he married at age of 13 and sita was well educated women so she goes to gurukul and she goes gurukul at 11 and did her upnayan sanskaar and for source her teacher name was gargi she stayed in gurukul ashram for 4-5 years and after that she married ram and it is mention in valmiki ramayan the real ramyan that sita stayed 2 yr in ayodhya after marriage then she leaved with ram okay and u forgot about diwvja which means after upanayan sankar the student get new age start from 1 so whe she said that my husband was 25 means 25 years after upanayan sankar and she was 18 means after upanayan sankar and they did upanyaskaar at age of 11 so add 25+11=36 , 18+11=29 and the age difference between rama and sita is correct 6 years ok bro go and read ramayan first and this child marriage thing is only existed in Arbhamic religion okay so don't spread false news Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-29996182441008652562022-10-04T12:56:12.912+08:002022-10-04T12:56:12.912+08:00That doesn't even make sense. What? Lund namaz...That doesn't even make sense. What? Lund namazi. Basic Crux is even Ramayana tells Ma Sita was 18 and Lord Rama was 25 during exile so it means he was at most 13 during marriage. It was child marriage not p*dophilia Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-54989713675665212832022-10-04T12:54:41.190+08:002022-10-04T12:54:41.190+08:00Changing rules? Ma Sita herself tes she was 18 and...Changing rules? Ma Sita herself tes she was 18 and Rama was 25 during exile which means she was 6-7 and Rama was 12-13 during their marriage. Yup Dharma is great, islam is 💩Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-66895406970315186042022-10-04T12:51:07.636+08:002022-10-04T12:51:07.636+08:00Walt Mickey wrote Ramayana or Valmiki? Literally M...Walt Mickey wrote Ramayana or Valmiki? Literally Ma Sita herself says she is 18 and her husband is 25 at the time of their exile. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-91701175917379887862022-10-04T12:48:53.616+08:002022-10-04T12:48:53.616+08:00Can you prove any of your claim against Rama? We c...Can you prove any of your claim against Rama? We can prove against Muhammad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-46128756696438594842022-10-04T12:48:12.363+08:002022-10-04T12:48:12.363+08:00Dashrath itself means lord of 10 sides. None of th...Dashrath itself means lord of 10 sides. None of the jihadis are able to prove 25 year old Rama married 6 year old Sita. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-38179216844160130342022-06-23T12:46:52.849+08:002022-06-23T12:46:52.849+08:00According to history the sister of mother Aaishah ...According to history the sister of mother Aaishah (ra) her sister Asma (ra) was older than Aaishah ten years. The age of Asma (ra) at the time of first Hijri 27 years. So according to this perfect history the age of Mother Aaishah was 17 years at the time of Hijrah. She was married in 2 Hijri. So her age was 19 years. <br />The of عشرۂ ten missed in printing in beginning. So it was ستۃ عشرۃ 16 and تسعۃ عشرۃ 19 .<br />According to history also it is right. The missing of a word in printing, it is possible as you see in news papers too. <br />Please translate this research in English as it is said in it. <br /><br />ہماری تحقیق یہ ہے کہ سیدہ عائشہ صدیقہ رضی اللہ عنہا کی عمر مبارک شادی کے وقت کم سے کم 17 یا 19 سال تھی۔<br /><br />دلائل: حضرت عائشہ صدیقہ رضی اللہ عنہا کی بڑی بہن سیدہ اسماء بنت ابی بکر رضی اللہ عنہا طویل العمر صحابیات میں سے ہیں۔ عبداللہ بن زبیر رضی اللہ عنہ کی والدہ محترمہ ہیں۔ بڑی خدا رسیدہ عبادت گذار اور بہادر خاتون ان کی عمر تمام مورخین نے سو سال لکھی ہے۔ سیدہ عائشہ صدیقہ رضی اللہ عنہا ان سے دس سال چھوٹی ہیں۔ سیدہ اسماء حضرت عبداللہ بن زبیر کی شہادت کے پانچ یا دس دن بعد فوت ہوئیں۔ سن وفات 73ھ ہے۔ اس حساب سے سیدہ اسماء کی عمر ہجرت کے وقت 27 سال ہوئی اور سیدہ عائشہ صدیقہ رضی اللہ عنہا ان سے دس سال چھوٹی ہیں تو آپ کی عمر ہجرت کے وقت 17 سال ہوئی۔ اگر سیدہ عائشہ صدیقہ رضی اللہ عنہا کی رخصتی 2ھ کو مانی جائے تو رخصتی کے وقت آپ کی عمر مبارک 19 سال ہوئی۔ حوالہ جات ملاحظہ ہوں۔<br /><br />اسلمت اسماء قديما وهم بمکة فی اول الاسلام... وهی آخر المهاجرين والمهاجرات موتا. وکانت هی اکبر من اختها عائشة بعشر سنين.. بلغت من العمر ماته سنة.<br /><br />اسماء مکہ میں اوائل اسلام میں مسلمان ہوئیں۔ مہاجرین مردوں عورتوں میں سب سے آخر فوت ہونے والی ہیں۔ اپنی بہن سیدہ عائشہ رضی اللہ عنہا سے دس سال بڑی تھیں‘‘۔<br /><br />(ابن کثير، البدايه والنهايه 8 / 346 طبع بيروت)<br /><br />اسلمت قديما بعد اسلام سبعة عشر انسانا... ماتت بمکة بعد قتله بعشره ايام وقيل بعشرين يوماً وذلک فی جمادی الاولیٰ سنة ثلاث وسبعين.<br /><br />مکہ معظمہ میں سترہ آدمیوں کے بعد ابتدائی دور میں مسلمان ہوئیں۔۔۔ اور مکہ مکرمہ میں اپنے بیٹے (عبداللہ بن زبیر رضی اللہ عنہ ) کی شہادت کے دس یا بیس دن بعد فوت ہوئیں اور یہ واقع ماہ جمادی الاولیٰ سن 73ھ کا ہے‘‘<br /><br />(علامه ابن حجر عسقلانی، تهذيب التهذيب 12 ص 426 طبع لاهور، الامام ابوجعفر محمد بن حرير طبری، تاريخ الامم والملوک ج 5 ص 31 طبع بيروت، حافظ ابونعيم احمد بن عبدالله الاصبهانی م 430ه، حلية الولياء وطبقات الاصفياء 2 ص 56 طبع بيروت)<br /><br />اسلمت قديما بمکة وبايعت رسول الله صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم.. ماتت اسماء بنت ابی بکرالصديق بعد قتل ابنها عبدالله بن الزبير وکان قتله يوم الثلثاء لسبع عشرة ليلة خلت من جمادی الاولیٰ سنة ثلاث وسبعين.<br /><br />’’سیدہ اسماء بنت ابوبکر صدیق رضی اللہ عنہ مکہ معظمہ میں قدیم الاسلام ہیں۔ آپ نے رسول اللہA کی بیعت کی۔ اپنے بیٹے عبداللہ بن زبیر کی شہادت کے چند دن بعد فوت ہوئیں۔ عبداللہ بن زبیر رضی اللہ عنہ کی شہادت بروز منگل 12 جمادی الاولیٰ 73ھ کو ہوئی ہے‘‘۔<br /><br />(محمد ابن سود الکاتب الواقدی 168ه م 230ه الطبقات الکبریٰ ج 8 / 255 طبع بيروت)<br /><br />کانت اسن من عائشة وهی اختها من ابيها.. ولدت قبل التاريخ لسبع وعشرين سنة.<br /><br />’’سیدہ اسمائ، سیدہ عائشہ رضی اللہ عنہا سے زیادہ عمر کی تھیں۔ باپ کی طرف سے سگی بہن تھیں۔ ہجرت سے 27 سال قبل پیدا ہوئیں‘‘۔<br /><br />(امام ابن الجوزی، اسدالغايه فی معرفة الصحابة ج 5 ص 392 طبع رياض)<br /><br />اسلمت قديما بمکة قال ابن اسحق بعد سبعة عشر نفسا.. بلغت اسماء مائة سنة ولدت قبل الهجرة لسبع وعشرين سنة.<br /><br />سیدہ اسماء رضی اللہ عنہا مکہ مکرمہ میں ابتدائً مسلمان ہوئیں۔ ابن اسحاق نے کہا سترہ انسانوں کے بعد سو سال عمر پائی ہجرت سے 27 سال پہلے پیدا ہوئیں‘‘۔<br /><br /> (شهاب الدين ابوالفضل احمد بن علی بن حجر عسقلانی، الاصابة فی تميز الصحابة 4 ص 230 م 773ه طبع بيروت، سيرة ابن هشام م 1 ص 271 طبع بيروت، علامه ابن الاثير، الکامل فی التاريخ 4، ص 358 طبع بيروت، علامه ابوعمر يوسف ابن عبدالله بن محمد بن عبدالقرطبی 363ه، الاستيعاب فی اسماء الاصحاب علی هامش الاصابة 463ه ج 4 ص 232 طبع بيروت، حافظ شمس الدين محمد بن احمد الذهبی، تاريخ الاسلام ودفيات المشاهير والاسلام ج 5 ص 30 طبع بيروت، الروض الانف شرح سيرة ابن هشام ج 1 ص 166 طبع ملتان)<br /><br />یہ حقیقت بھی پیش نظر رہے کہ<br /><br />واللہ و رسولہ اعلم بالصواب۔<br /><br />مفتی: عبدالقیوم ہزاروی <br />گوگل پر.At Google<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-63743070005246343122022-06-15T11:14:33.237+08:002022-06-15T11:14:33.237+08:00Very good question. This data should solve the pr...Very good question. This data should solve the problem of her date of birth atleast astronomicall.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-12726326228544524552022-06-12T19:24:47.480+08:002022-06-12T19:24:47.480+08:00Adnan, according to text by George the 3rd , aisha...Adnan, according to text by George the 3rd , aisha was born to a whore which Muhammad fell for. Later when he came to know that she had aids due to Muhammad, he planned to marry her and infact her at 9.trying to justify a pedophile rapist won't change anything. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-60401856440046951652022-06-08T21:49:48.079+08:002022-06-08T21:49:48.079+08:00Well maybe you have no problem with Hindus, but if...Well maybe you have no problem with Hindus, but if you come out of your cave then you'll know how Muslims are acting towards Hindus and their traditions. Thye keep troubling Hindus whenever they want. I hope they also read the same Qur'an that you read. Then what do you think that influence them when they do attacks on Hindus and insult Hindu Gods? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-88060674337310796782022-06-06T17:58:17.779+08:002022-06-06T17:58:17.779+08:00Your article is wrong as you've translated dwa...Your article is wrong as you've translated dwadash which means 12 as 2. Let me clarify everything here.<br />Dvija is the second birth of a person in hinduism which he gets through knowledge (often called as spiritual birth). Bhagwan Rama was 13-14 according to his dvija which he took in 11 years of physical age. Physically, he was 24-25. Similarly, Mata Sita was 6 according to her dvija and as she also took that in 11, she was 17-18 as of her physical age. These ignorant bigots who say that sita was a child don't even have enough intellect to understand sanatani concepts. So all they do is misinterpreting our texts to defend the pathetic nature of their own religion where a 54 year old man rapes a 9 year old girl who used to play with doll (as she herself said in one of their text). They can't justify this as this is truth. And when their scholars like Zakir Naik say the same thing, everything's good but if anyone out of their religion says the sams, these terrorists get offended.These kinds of people are threat to humanity and hopefully people realise this fact soon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-40241293991556669652022-06-02T23:06:20.141+08:002022-06-02T23:06:20.141+08:00In the Vulgate [1] edition, when Ravana appears be...In the Vulgate [1] edition, when Ravana appears before Sita in the guise of a saint, she entails the details of her family background.<br /><br />She mentions that after her marriage with Rama, she stayed in Ayodhya for 12 years.<br /><br />उषित्वा द्वा दश समाः इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |<br /><br />भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी || ३-४७-४<br /><br />𝑑𝑣𝑎𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑎𝐻 means two & ten [twelve] years.<br /><br />Sita says: "On residing in the residence of Ikshvaku-s in Ayodhya for twelve years, I was in sumptuosity of all cherishes while relishing all humanly prosperities. [3-47-4]”<br /><br />Janaki also reveals that she was 18 at the time of exile while Rama was 25.<br /><br />मम भर्ता महातेजा वयसा पंच विंशकः || ३-४७-१०<br /><br />अष्टा दश हि वर्षाणि मम जन्मनि गण्यते |<br /><br />"My great-resplendent husband was of twenty-five years of age at that time, and to me eighteen years are reckoned up from my birth. [3-47-10b, 11a]”<br /><br />Sita also repeats the same to Hanuman in the Sundarkanda, stating that he stayed in Raghava’s house for a period of 12 years.<br /><br />समा द्वादश तत्र अहम् राघवस्य निवेशने || ५-३३-१७<br /><br />भुन्जाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी |<br /><br />"I stayed in Rama's house there for twelve years, enjoying the worldly pleasures belonging to humankind and fulfilling all my desires."<br /><br />On this basis, a simple conclusion has been drawn by popular Bengali authors like Rajsekhar Basu and Upendranth Mukherjee et al [2]. Both of them (and many others) have suggested in their footnotes that Sita was married to Rama when she was only six years of age.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-41290706525020251512022-06-01T11:08:19.855+08:002022-06-01T11:08:19.855+08:00These bigoted peacefuls are so bad at arguments.. ...These bigoted peacefuls are so bad at arguments.. which hindu texts mention that shri krishna abused maa rukmini?none at all! And even if we go by these 'mistranslated' verses..Lord Ram's age at the time of their marriage was 13 and Mata Sita's was 6.. there is literally no hindu scripture which says otherwise..and even this will only be called as child marriage.. not pedophilia! There is no mention of consummation at all! Unlike the prophet ,a man in hid 50s who marries a 6 year old girl and then has sex with her at at age of 9..which is mentioned explicitly in their own scripture(sahih al-bukhari 5134)..in what world does a 9 year old knows about consent? Which normal man in his 50s would have sex with a 9 year old child? No one unless he is a pedophile..I know it is hard for u bigots to digest/accept, even your own clerics/scholars have never refuted this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-22322522598256386392021-06-12T05:28:33.681+08:002021-06-12T05:28:33.681+08:00Total lies.
There is no temple that puts age of ...Total lies. <br /><br />There is no temple that puts age of Sita Mata at 5 and Lord Ram at 25. You would not be able to give any proper source of that slander. However, there are numerous Hadees in the most trusted of Hadees books - Sahi Bukhari - where Aisha herself narrates that she was 9 when 54 year old Muhammad consummated the marriage.<br /><br />Muslims constantly attack Hindi faith directly when they have the upper hand. And in covert manners when Muslims are weak. Qur'an never says not to insult the deities of other religions indefinitely. It is a Medina verse which was later abrogated by Meccan verses. Even in the Medina verse, it says not to attack the beliefs of others because other's can attack yours too. So it not in nobility that you refrain from attack, but fear.<br /><br />And your Zakir Naik has exposed Islam and attacked other faiths enough. Now there is no hiding and turning back. The Djinn is out of the bottle. <br /><br />Enjoy the discourse. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14578256049058862503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-77298576231527779482021-03-09T12:20:49.302+08:002021-03-09T12:20:49.302+08:00Lol muhhamad was a war lord 😂 and muslims are buc...Lol muhhamad was a war lord 😂 and muslims are buch of intolerant puzzies that's why they start beheading people as soon as someone draws muhhamad. Muhhamad and islam is so weak that it gets insecure by a drawing 🤣 that's how weak islam is. Allah is nothing more than a pig people make pork out of 🤭 muhhamad pig pork thusalam and allah-nalla is a pimp who offers 72 prostitudes including fatima,ayesha and Zainab Allah ka baalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10773771958147265513noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-75088820834259697022021-03-09T12:15:26.321+08:002021-03-09T12:15:26.321+08:00Lol u can't name an actual verse where it tell...Lol u can't name an actual verse where it tells Sita's real age but I can clearly state al Bukhari and sahil bukhari verses where Ayesha's age was mentioned as 6 year old. Muhhamad was a well known childrapist pedophile plus he married his own laughter and law Zainab. Plus islamic scriptures clearly approve sex with animals no wonder why people around the world called muhhamad a goathumper. Muhhamad used to have sexual relations with goats and camels plus he created a fake allah and told people how there is a red light in the sky where a pimp named allah offers 72 prostitudes. Muhhamad was an illiterate merchant who was so useless that he couldn't achieve a life of his own and was completely dependent on his wife khadija's propertyAllah ka baalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10773771958147265513noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-39345093863910084142020-09-24T17:45:00.992+08:002020-09-24T17:45:00.992+08:00Child marriage is not bad in itself if its between...Child marriage is not bad in itself if its between two children ... when the actual consummation of marriage is to take place when the two become adults. its only that in the current society this is held to be wrong. The concept of marriage changes shape in each age. Therefore, we cannot judge the marriage between two children -- Ram and Sita in the Treta Yuga as wrong.<br /><br />Of course, there is no proof that they consummated their marriage before they attained adulthood although, Sita was brought to Ayodhya.Different eras have had different rules about 'bidai' and 'gauna.'<br /><br />Marrying an adult to a child is however a different matter altogether, especially, if the child is pre-puberty. This, as well as having sex with a pre-pubescent child is indeed evil in any age. This is not dependant on place or time. This is what Paedophilia is all about.Sudhanshunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-28416809179771506302020-09-16T11:33:57.639+08:002020-09-16T11:33:57.639+08:00Mata Aysha was 22 when she married while Ram marri...Mata Aysha was 22 when she married while Ram married 5-year-old Sita at the age of 25. Ram was actually pedophile. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15677956827682238494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-88223911962198746162020-09-16T11:30:10.288+08:002020-09-16T11:30:10.288+08:00तेरी माँ की चूत हरामी।बात राम और सीता की हो रही तू...तेरी माँ की चूत हरामी।बात राम और सीता की हो रही तू हमारे पैग़म्बर को बीच में ले आया. कुश घास से केसे पैदा हुआ यह बता. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15677956827682238494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-34843273055768294932020-09-16T11:25:57.251+08:002020-09-16T11:25:57.251+08:00Exactly. Thousands of ahadith written by zealot sc...Exactly. Thousands of ahadith written by zealot scholars are pack of lies. The ahadith converted Islam into Mullaism.<br />Another hadith that Prophet Muhammad PBUH told some people to drink camel urine for diarrhea is also a pack of lies. The Prophet who always insists on cleaness how can he suggest camel urine as a medicine? The zealots changed the shape of Islam. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15677956827682238494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8825101291759149808.post-2921778705483240172020-09-16T11:19:07.187+08:002020-09-16T11:19:07.187+08:00Now you put blame on Islam. You defend Ram's m...Now you put blame on Islam. You defend Ram's marriage with 5-year-old Sita at the age of 25, Mata Aysha's age was between 22-27 at the time of marriage. It is historically proved. It was an adult marriage and not child marriage.<br />Can you explain how Kusha was born? That's why I say 'Don't throw stones on the others when you are sitting in a glass house. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15677956827682238494noreply@blogger.com